In today’s
world, cosmetic surgeries and procedures that performed to remove aging marks
or give luscious set of lips is all too common The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) state
that filler procedures are the second most popular non-surgical cosmetic
procedure in the US.
This made me wonder what the number one cosmetic procedure was and if it also
results in bacterial infections like filler injections do. Another common thing that goes in hand is the
bacterial infections that result from these treatments. According to the article
I read, researchers estimate 1:100 and 1:1000 bacterial
infections result from gel filled injection procedures depending on the type of
filler that was used. In some cases, people have even been left with permanently
disfigured faces because the infections became too difficult to fight off.
Researcher stated that it can only take about 10 bacteria to cause horrible
lesion and create a tough biofilm which makes it almost impossible to treat
with antibiotics. One thing that I would have liked to know which the article didn’t
mention was the name of the specie(s) that causes that those infections, just
for curiosity. I felt like the author was passively criticizing cosmetic
practitioners only because they repeated that fact that practitioners believed
that infections were caused by auto-immune or allergic reactions to the gel
injected. The article also stated that practitioners refused to believe that
infections were caused by bacteria even after research proved it. The good news
is that infections can be avoided if by injecting prophylactic antibiotics with
the gel filler at the same time. So just a heads up, the next time you’re
thinking about getting a facial cosmetic procedure, make sure they use those
antibiotics!
![]() |
| http://www.dermalfiller.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/benefits-dermal-fillers.jpg http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/01/16/article-2540497-1AB5AC9E00000578-486_634x471.jpg |


What do you think about that statement that practicioners refused to believe the danger? Do you think that is an overstatent/generalization? What is the purpose of that?
ReplyDelete